Index funds are everywhere in modern portfolios, and while many investors have been told they should invest in them, not many understand why they may or may not be a good fit for their personal situation.
Currently, index funds are seeing even more increased visibility due to the death of Jack Bogle, the founder and chief executive officer of the Vanguard Group.
Bogle was known throughout financial services as the founder of the index fund, and he was one of the most influential men the investing world has ever seen.
Let’s examine Bogle’s creation so you can better understand the place of an index fund in a portfolio and how to determine whether they may or may not support your financial goals.
A Definition of Index Funds
While the words “index fund” might conjure some mystical ideas about funds that are supposedly always going to help a portfolio because they are widely invested in so many assets, they really aren’t that mysterious.
Here’s a definition: An index fund is simply a mutual fund that, instead of having a portfolio manager making individual stock selections, outsources the capital allocation job to the individual or committee determining the index it will mimic and methodology it will use.
Most often, an index fund is designed to track along with the S&P 500 (which contains, you guessed it, 500 companies) or the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a list of 30 “blue chip” companies.
But while most index funds track along with the broad overall market, they can be set up to track almost any segment of the markets—by sector, investing goal (like the of-the-moment fascination with impact investing), and many other criteria.
The History of Index Funds
Jack Bogle introduced the world to index mutual funds with the Vanguard 500 fund, released in 1976, a year after he founded the Vanguard Group.
Bogle got his start in investments immediately after graduating from Princeton in 1951, and he eventually became chairman of the Wellington Fund in 1970.
Bogle believed that investors would be best served by buy-and-hold investment strategies, and that an individual shouldn’t necessarily try to outperform the market by picking individual stocks, but instead track with the performance of the markets overall.
As a result, he created the Vanguard 500.
And if you look at the history of the fund, it didn’t do well initially. In fact, it was routinely dismissed by almost everyone. As performance lagged in the late 70’s critics referred to index funds as “Bogles Folly.”
In fact, no one else tried to create another index mutual fund until 1984 when Wells Fargo introduced its own fund.
Even though the initial reception wasn’t all positive, Bogle kept at it. It’s the story of every successful person in history, right?
Over time, those first index funds began to attract more investments. Since that inauspicious start, they’ve grown into the largest investing category around today.
That launch started taking off in the 1990s when the first index fund craze took hold of investors. From 1995 to 2000, assets in index funds increased tenfold—from less than $50 billion to almost $500 billion.
That’s quite a run.
And it brings us to where we are today.
The State of Index Funds in 2019
That is some incredible ownership of the market.
Along with capturing 20% of equity investments, the Vanguard 500 has grown exponentially along with index funds as a whole.
Today, Jack Bogle’s brainchild (the Vanguard 500 fund), has gone all the way up to $407 billion in assets. And overall, US based passive index funds now hold $3.6 trillion in assets.
So, the obvious question is—if so much of investors’ money goes to index funds, does that mean that they’re right for everyone?
Let’s look at the pros and cons of index funds so you can get a better idea of what role they might play in an investor’s portfolio.
The Benefits of Index Funds
In addition index funds are readily available at major custodians and workplace retirement plans.
The most-often cited pro of index funds is the one you’ll see marketed from nearly every provider. Index funds can offer lower fees and expense ratios than other types of funds.
If you want cheap equity exposure there is nothing better than an index fund.
For the average DIY investor, index funds help to create a diverse portfolio without doing much work. Rather than balancing your asset allocations across the individual stocks you picked out, you can grab an index fund instead and own everything.
The Drawbacks of Index Funds
Just like index funds offer some benefits, they can also include several drawbacks.
These are the most important cons to understand about investing only in index funds.
One of the most important elements of managing a successful portfolio is understanding your level of risk, and how much risk you must endure to achieve the gains necessary to meet your financial goals.
An index fund, by its very nature, tracks with the market. As such, it’s not possible to fully align your true personal risk tolerance with the risk an index fund introduces.
Remember that when a bear market comes around, an index fund guarantees you’ll suffer 100% of that market decline—it is tracking what the market’s doing, after all.
These bear market declines from major indices can be unnerving for even the most aggressive investors. Major market indices have all, at one point in time, declined in excess of -50%.
Source: YCharts 12/31/2018
Part of the reason why index funds don’t offer good risk management is that they tend to gravitate toward a narrow set of high-performing, in-the-moment stocks.
As more money flows to all the same stocks, their prices go even higher, and they become more and more overvalued. In the case of the S&P 500, it’s a capitalization weighted index; that means that money invested in a given index fund does not get evenly distributed across all 500 stocks. The five largest S&P 500 stocks have a market capitalization equal to the bottom 282 stocks!
The risk management most investors may think they’re achieving by investing in an index fund is not spread as evenly as many assume.
How much risk management is in place by owning many times more shares of Microsoft, Apple and Amazon than more defensive companies in the index?
Index Funds Can’t Always Give You Access to New Niches
Indexing, by its focus on broader market performance, doesn’t always offer access to niches that could offer better chances to align performance and risk with a portfolio’s needs.
The places where active management has the best chance of delivering superior performance are the niches where indexing is less established, or more difficult to establish a solid foothold.
Index Funds Rarely Get the Best Price
If one of the core benefits of index funds is that they offer lower costs, then you’d think that they also should always save an investor money in other ways too. But that’s not necessarily true.
Too often, index funds violate the first rule of good investment behavior buying stocks when their price is high, and selling them off when they’re low.
Typically, companies will only be removed from an index when they’re at their lowest point. The company that replaces them isn’t going to be some also-ran who can’t create profits for their shareholders. It’s going to be a higher-valued entrant than the company that just exited.
As a result, index fund investors often are not getting the best prices on the stocks owned within an index fund.
The Potomac Approach to Investing
At Potomac, we believe there’s a time and a place for everything in investing. We are not dogmatic believers that passive strategies always win, nor are we always going to advocate for more active strategies when another may result in better results.
We believe in the flexibility of tactical management. Sometimes, the best decision is to hold a passive fund. Other times, the expertise of a seasoned stock picker will add more value.
Blindly following the passive movement that has dominated the airwaves and led to the incredible increase in index fund investing can be problematic for investors approaching retirement, especially as very different market cycles take hold.
When we work with our clients, we focus on creating risk-managed, personal portfolios that are built to an individual’s or a family’s goals and needs.
You may not need to outperform the market, and you may not care to track with the market either if that’s not what your financial goals call for.
Putting a focus on real-life situations and not performance return numbers can create a positive perspective shift when you’re evaluating life after retirement and decreases the financial stress that can come with risky investments that don’t match your personal situation.
We also take a rules-based approach to investing. By operating through a set standard, we attempt to alleviate those large bear market losses that passive investors simply must accept and wait to end.
If you’d like to see what it’s like to be a Potomac client, please connect with us to begin the conversation.